On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 10:40 +0800, Jason Lim wrote: > Actually, if you're talking about the RedHat Linux distros, the last > "stable" one was Redhat Linux 9. All the FC ones are being released way > too fast and frequently to be used on a stable server. rh7.0 - released September 2000 - 5 months after rh6.2 rh7.1 - released April 2001 - 7 months after rh7.0 rh7.2 - released October 2001 - 5 months after rh7.1 rh7.3 - released May 2002 - 7 months after rh7.2 rh8.0 - released September 2002 - 4 months after rh7.3 rh9 - released March 2003 - 6 months after rh8.0 fc1 - released September 2003 - 6 months after rh9 fc2 - released May 2004 - 8 months after fc1 fc3 - released November 2004 - 6 months after fc2 fc4 - projected to be released in May 2005 - 6 months after fc3 I don't see FC being released faster than RHL used to be. What makes you think it's any less stable? Marc.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
