Re: LWN article about us

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> IMHO, we should stick with RHL73.
>
> When we get FC2 support, I suggest dropping FC1.  There will be WAY
> too many FC releases to take care of all of them, so I suggest just
> handling the latest.
>
> Those users which have installed Fedora Core should have realized that
> it has much shorter support cycle, and they need to upgrade to newer
> releases of FC to stay current.
>

Even though we don't have any RH7.3 servers anymore, I agree with you.
Anyone installing Fedora Core knows in advanced it is not going to be a
"stable" or "long release" distro, and they know they are expected to
upgrade constantly.

There was no such expectation with RHL9, and to an extent 7.3.

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux