Re: LWN article about us

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Personally I still have several older servers running RH7.3 (our cluster controlpanel server and some older Plesk machines), RH9 and due to the screwed up AACRAID SATA drivers in the 2.6 kernel, I'm stuck using FC1 on our Dell poweredge 750's which customers want to rent..

I think fedoralegacy is a fantastic initiative, and I cheer the continuing support of FC1, RH7.3 and RH9

At 07:32 4-2-2005, you wrote:


IMHO, we should stick with RHL73.

When we get FC2 support, I suggest dropping FC1. There will be WAY too many FC releases to take care of all of them, so I suggest just handling the latest.

Those users which have installed Fedora Core should have realized that it has much shorter support cycle, and they need to upgrade to newer releases of FC to stay current.

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list



Met vriendelijke groet,

Jeroen Wunnink,
EasyHosting B.V. Systeembeheerder
systeembeheer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

telefoon:+31 (035) 6285455              Postbus 1332
fax: +31 (035) 6838242                  1200 BH Hilversum

http://www.easyhosting.nl
http://www.easycolo.nl


-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux