On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 09:41:16 -0700, Michal Jaegermann <michal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 09:43:18AM -0500, Matt Nuzum wrote: > > > > > It takes 100's and 100's of > > hours to certify an application such as mine on a new platform - those > > 100's and 100's of hours equate into a lot of money. > > This means that you have a serious incentive if you care about that > fix. I do care, unfortunately I am not qualified to do more than test, and I will when fixes become available. Understand, I'm not trying to start a battle, I was merely putting my $0.02 into a thread that was starting to split between "lets try to fix it" and "just upgrade to newer PHP." My point is that upgrading to a newer PHP is not a satisfactory solution to me and likely others, because if it were that easy I/we would have already upgraded. > > Honestly, if I wanted newer versions of the software, I would upgrade. > > I need to use FL because I can't afford the instability of FC > > This "instability of FC" is in my experience more legend than a > fact. True, FC1 had various issues and so did RH8 and from what > I have seen much more severe. I am not trying to say that FC is "buggy," stable to me in this context means supported and consistent. FC upgrades its software to newer versions w/out any warning and introduces new features. If doing a `yum update` breaks a program then in this context it is unstable; FC is all about up-to-date, not about legacy support. -- Matthew Nuzum <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> www.followers.net - Makers of "Elite Content Management System" View samples of Elite CMS in action by visiting http://www.followers.net/portfolio/ -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
