On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 09:43:18AM -0500, Matt Nuzum wrote: > > > It takes 100's and 100's of > hours to certify an application such as mine on a new platform - those > 100's and 100's of hours equate into a lot of money. This means that you have a serious incentive if you care about that fix. > Presumably the PHP 4.1 that is currently in fedora legacy Er, no. This dependes on a platform. If you are talking about RH7.3 installation, with updates, then you are correct. Something which started as RH9 or FC1 will have later versions of PHP. > > Honestly, if I wanted newer versions of the software, I would upgrade. > I need to use FL because I can't afford the instability of FC This "instability of FC" is in my experience more legend than a fact. True, FC1 had various issues and so did RH8 and from what I have seen much more severe. In any case nothing prevents you from using and _supporting_ Tao, cAos or Whitebox if you want long term platform but do not want to pay for RHEL. > I pray that some way can be found to ascertain if the problems apply > to RH7.3 Well, you have other choices outside of praying. You can wait and do nothing hoping that one day somebody will solve the problem. You can sit down and do patching and testing yourself. Your contribution to an ongoing maintenance of Legacy will be eagerly awaited. Or you can try to hire somebody to do that job for you. Sounds like in your case this should be higly cost effective. As I wrote: I did spent some time trying to see how to backport fixes. This turns out to be far from obvious and requires much more effort and time then _I_ am willing to spent on that in this moment. It does not mean that for somebody else the whole thing will look substantially different. This is a _community_ project. Michal -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
