On 08.10.04 17:25, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
In fact, I will remove the superceded packages from the listing as it is true that they obscure the useful parts of the list to some extent.
I agree, that would be the sensible thing to do :-).
Last thing: sorting the list in order of priority (as proposed by someone in the ML) would be more clear together with grouping the "duplicate" entries. (Uh -- well, I feel pretty stupid now, probably thanks to a sudden shortage of caffeine in my bloodstream :) so feel free to ignore me!
> >XFree86 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1831 > >Needs VERIFY for rh9 (superceded)
> I had downloaded the rpm of XFree86-4.3.0-2.90.57.legacy and used it > so far without problems (even with GIMP) but, in reading the new > bugreport, I'm now a bit confused.
If you look at the bottom of that bug it gives a link to the new bug on which work on packages are currently being done:
https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2075
That's the bugreport I was talking about :-) I've re-read it but I'm still confused about what I should do with the version of XFree86 I'm currently using/testing now :p
(If I've read it correctly, only gtk+ and libXpm are the elements affected by this specific security issue and I have a handful of X-related programs that uses one or both of them -- fortunately I'm the only one using the RH9 box used for QA and I have a tight firewall in it, but still, I don't know what I should do :-)
-- +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | WARNING WARNING WARNING *** EMAIL ADDRESS CHANGED! | | USE EMAIL ADDRESS PROVIDED BELOW | | IF YOU KEEP WRITING TO THE OLD ADDRESS IT IS NOT MY FAULT! | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Barbara Pennacchi b.pennacchi@xxxxxxxxxxx | | Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche | | Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione | | V.le Marx 15, 00137 Roma, Italia | | http://www.istc.cnr.it/ | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
