Dominic, I would like to take the opportunity to thank you again for compiling and maintaining this list. I use it constantly to maintain my own list of what I am using for QA. Steve Dudek On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 11:25, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 04:18:26PM +0200, Barbara Pennacchi wrote: > > > sorry dominic, but when you list multiple entries in this way it is a bit > > hard to find the correct entries -- could you at least specify WHICH > > kernel they refer to? (same goes for XFree86 below) > > It's beyond what I'd want to maintain manually to include version > numbers of all relevant patches. The short of it is that there should > only be one non-"superceded" bug relevant for each. > > In fact, I will remove the superceded packages from the listing as it is > true that they obscure the useful parts of the list to some extent. > > > >XFree86 - https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1831 > > >Needs VERIFY for rh9 (superceded) > > > > I had downloaded the rpm of XFree86-4.3.0-2.90.57.legacy and used it so > > far without problems (even with GIMP) but, in reading the new bugreport, > > I'm now a bit confused. > > > > What should I do? cool off while waiting for the more expert testers to > > come up with usable&testable rpms for RH9 or download the srpm and try to > > build the whole shebang on my own (yikes ;) or should I go ahead with my > > report on XFree86 rpms related to ver 4.3.0-2.90.57.legacy or what? :p > > If you look at the bottom of that bug it gives a link to the new bug on > which work on packages are currently being done: > > https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2075 > > Cheers, > > Dominic. > > -- > > fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list > > !DSPAM:4166b19b81721412413577! > > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
