On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 05:02:38PM -0500, Eric Rostetter wrote: > My understanding, which may be wrong, is they sit in updates-testing > until they get publish votes, at which time they are moved out. If > that is wrong, then ignore me. If that is right, then most of the > things in update-testing don't have publish votes, so it is a mute > point. There certainly seems to be confusion about the terminology used in the bug reporting system and process. I and others have been under the impression that the packages were released after two weeks if no further problems were found, as did you in <1094585037.1aa0b0d478bbb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: "And 2 weeks is a timeout if no one votes on it." Clearly a 2 week timeout is not in place. > I also acknowledge that we can't just wait for Jesse to seek out people > to delegate to. People have to actively solicit the position, and prove > themself worthy of the trust involved. Until that happens, Jesse has > no one to delegate to. I volunteered to help with the build server when Jesse mentioned it, and I can currently only assume we should wait until it is available. Dominic. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
