On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Marc Deslauriers wrote: > On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 06:17, Dan Hollis wrote: > > What I find amusing is that RH8 is not supported, but RH9 with the > > 'tls and rpm from hell' is...? Weird. > The fact that RH8 was dropped had nothing to do with technology. It was > simply that no one was volunteering their time to QA the package > proposals FL had in bugzilla. > It was quite simply lack of community interest. Then whoever maintains the http://www.fedoralegacy.org/ website should remove RH8 from the list of officially supported platforms on the webpage. http://www.fedoralegacy.org/about/faq.php It might confuse people into thinking its actually supported when it isn't. -Dan -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
