The real reason RH9 is supported is that there is no RH10 and never will be. FC1 is a different attitude on the part of Red Hat, Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (610)796-5838 >>> marcdeslauriers@xxxxxxxxxxxx 07/23/04 06:45AM >>> On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 06:17, Dan Hollis wrote: > What I find amusing is that RH8 is not supported, but RH9 with the > 'tls and rpm from hell' is...? Weird. The fact that RH8 was dropped had nothing to do with technology. It was simply that no one was volunteering their time to QA the package proposals FL had in bugzilla. It was quite simply lack of community interest. Marc. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list ******************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
