On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Michael Mansour wrote: > That's interesting how you say that, you don't have a RH8 system and you're > making a recommendation based on that. Before FL dropped RH8 support, I ran 5 > large RH8 production servers, never had a problem with any of them and really > never needed to upgrade, they were humming along just fine. What I find amusing is that RH8 is not supported, but RH9 with the 'tls and rpm from hell' is...? Weird. -Dan -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
