On Friday 02 July 2004 11:15 am, William Stockall wrote: > Should people consider some sort of process for freezing packages which > are to be released? For example, all this discussion of whether to > include yet another patch in the kernel. What probably should happen is > a package is frozen for release testing. After that the only changes > that go in are for problems introduced due to the proposed updates. Any > further patches should go into the next release. > > > Thoughts? > yep I agree Will. That's kind of what I suggested a few hours ago as far as how crucial the patch is. Obviously if a massive root compromise comes out, it makes sense to patch it, but for everything else a freeze is logical. - Si > > Will. > > > -- > > fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list -- Simon Weller LPIC-2, BCIP Systems Engineer NZServers LTD http://www.nzservers.com/ U.S. Branch <- To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it. - Scott Granneman, Security Focus -> -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
