I have all your patches applied to a customer's internal version of Red Hat 7.3. They all applied without a problem, though the e1000 patch had an offset of over 1000 lines. The modified SRPM built without error. I'm currently running the kernel on my XW4100 workstation. I'm looking to install the kernel on a system with an e1000 tomorrow. I realize this report has limited value since the patches are applied to a different source base, but the fact that they applied so smoothly in the different environment should tell you something. 8) I'll be installing the FL kernel tonight on a home system. On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Hi, > > The latest kernel package has been up for QA for a couple of days - this > fixes a whopping 16 separate issues compared to the previous FL update. > It would be really excellent to get this released ASAP to stop it > snowballing - no doubt there will be further kernel issues discovered > and announced in the coming months, and some of these issues are now > already three months old! > > There has been a fair amount of QA on intermediate versions so I would > say that we are almost in a position to push to updates-testing. I've > had all the versions I've built work without problem on my workstation > here. > > If we could get one more QA tester for the current kernel revision > (2.4.20-34.x) I think we'll be there. Jesse, could I ask you to push > this package up the priority list please - it would be great to get > updates-testing packages out by the end of the week. > > The bugzilla entry is > <https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1484> > > Thanks, > > Dominic. > > > -- > > fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list > > -- Howard Owen "Even if you are on the right EGBOK Consultants track, you'll get run over if you hbo@xxxxxxxxx +1-650-218-2216 just sit there." - Will Rogers -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
