On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 22:41, Tres Seaver wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Monday 07 June 2004 11:26, Joe Pruett wrote: > > > >>since there still isn't an official apt or yum for fedora legacy on > >>rh9 boxes, we are instructed to use the fedora.us version. further, > >>we are only instructed to add the fedoralegacy.org url to the > >>sources.list file and not to comment out the fedora.us urls (or the > >>macromedia ones in sources.list.d). is this an oversight in the docs > >>(like not telling us to install the fedora legacy key)? or are you > >>relying on the other rpms that fedora.us would install (10 packages > >>that i see via apt-get -s upgrade)? i have assumed this is an > >>oversight and not installed the fedora.us rpms, but clarification > >>would be good, as well as updating the docs. > > > > > > Oversight. We absolutely do NOT depend on Fedora.us. A 9 version of > > yum is in QA mode, apt needs some love. > > Why not just use the apt from freshrpms? It lacks things like GPG-signature verification, automated updating of kernels and various other nice things that are in fedora.us apt (the current one for FC1 and FC2 that is) - Panu - -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
