Re: Redhat 8 to 9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Eric Rostetter wrote:

> Quoting seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> >> Very often I've had issues of apt and yum either uninstalling during an
> >> upgrade, or not working afterwards.
> >>
> >
> > i'd be impressed if yum removed something that was not obsoleted during
> > an upgrade. The code that follows out removal dep trees is never
> > encountered during an upgrade request.
> 
> That is why there is an "or" in there.  For instance, if you upgrade RH 8.0
> to RH 9 via apt-get using the FL test version of apt-get, it uninstalls
> apt during the upgrade!   

Apt follows it's own extremely strict requirement of leaving no
unsatisfied dependencies after any given operation to the point of
self-termination. When doing dist-upgrades with apt you should always 
point it to all the target distro version's third party repositories 
you're using, not just the OS itself to avoid these things (and actually 
get a much smoother upgrade). Mm.. that's a bit unclear sentence perhaps, 
what I mean is that if you're using lets say RHL 9 with freshrpms and want 
to upgrade to FC1, you need to point apt to FC1 os component AND freshrpms 
built for FC1 before proceeding with the upgrade.

	- Panu -


--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux