Hi, > > Even though it would be nice to not have to upgrade the FC1 machines > > until FC2 has been around for a while (and through several rounds of bug > > fixes), they are, after all, not servers. > > First, that is the whole foundation of FL. > > Second, a lot of people are running FC1 on servers (for better or for > worse). > > > Even through it has been solid for me on the desktop, when it came out > > FC1 was billed as an unstable release. > > Red Hat engineers have been pretty sworn that it was a stable option > for servers on every mailing list I've been on where the topic came up. > > > I suspect that for the most > > part people have not installed it on servers. > > While I wish that was true, it isn't. Many small shops are running > it on servers. I run it on 3 production servers which provide various on-line services for my clients. I also run it at home for ADSL dialup (PPPoE), squid, DNS, firewall. I don't understand what the mystery is in getting this on production and on servers, I run it and i'm positive many others do to. Apart from the SMP kernel problem (which I worked around) I didn't have any other issues and have found it rock solid for work, business and personal use. Michael. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
