On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 17:09, Jonathan Crowe wrote: > Even though it would be nice to not have to upgrade the FC1 machines > until FC2 has been around for a while (and through several rounds of bug > fixes), they are, after all, not servers. > > Even through it has been solid for me on the desktop, when it came out > FC1 was billed as an unstable release. I suspect that for the most > part people have not installed it on servers. Unstable release? I know a _bunch_ of people running FC1 on servers depending on FL to get patches out when RH stops. Marc. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
