On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 10:53, Barbara Pennacchi wrote: > On 13.04.04 18:58, Jeff Sheltren wrote: > > > The 'linux.bak' tag in lilo.conf is put there by yum, not by the kernel > > Nope, I haven't yet installed yum nor apt on the rh8 box. And I cannot nor > I would want to test yum/apt on a running website :D (and this answers a > previous email about those two programs). Until EOL of RH8 I used up2date > for kernel updates (it complained about the absence of grub too, but > installed everything anyway without removing old kernels). Hope this > clarifies everything because I'm not right away in the mood for re- > explaining from the start what was up2date's behaviour (which was what I > expected when I took the RPM from FLP's site...) > > For what concerns yum/apt, again: sorry folks, but I'd rather wait for > yum/apt to get declared stable for RH8 before starting to use it > (whichever one wins... :) OK, my bad. My guess is that up2date was the thing updating lilo.conf for you then... I'm not sure why you don't think yum is stable on RH8 though? Am I missing something? -Jeff -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
