Re: Update-excuses report?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please don't hassle project managers of opensource projects - they give up 
huge amounts of time free for the common good. When I started Smoothwall 
I'd get people try this one and they soon stopped.

On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Jesse Keating wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Friday 09 April 2004 05:36, John Dalbec wrote:
> > It would be nice if there were something like Debian's update-excuses
> > report that explained what was preventing various packages from being
> > moved to updates-testing (resp. updates).  For example, I did a
> > verification on the "mutt" package, but it hasn't moved to "updates"
> > yet.  Is my verification somehow unsatisfactory?  Is Jesse waiting for a
> > corroborating verification?
> >
> > Also, is anyone updating the bug priorities?  I don't know how those
> > should be set so I've been filing bugs with "normal" priority.  I see
> > one "blocker", two "critical", and several "major" bugs.  Are those
> > meaningful or were they just filed that way?
> 
> The biggest excuse has been my lack of time.  I had to get a couple 
> chapters written for an upcoming book, then I had in-laws drop in 
> unexpectantly.  Thankfully though, after this weekend's visit to another 
> set of inlaws I should have more free time before I need to start doing 
> some tech editing for yet another book.  There is also the issue of moving 
> download.fedoralegacy.org.  I don't want to make any changes to the 
> current one as rsync is off and httpd is severely throttled.  Once the new 
> system comes online, then I can make the changes (push the updates) that 
> need to happen.  I plan on devoting my free time to Legacy work.  There is 
> a lot in the queue that needs to be released, so those are top priority.  
> I am very sorry about the delay, wasn't expecting it.  We also need to 
> ramp up for RHL9 support.  I'll be building the RHL9 tree on download when 
> the new one comes up.
> 
> - -- 
> Jesse Keating RHCE	(http://geek.j2solutions.net)
> Fedora Legacy Team	(http://www.fedoralegacy.org)
> GPG Public Key		(http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
> 
> Was I helpful?  Let others know:
>  http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFAdrbz4v2HLvE71NURAssIAKDFG/LWV3CYdq75HYgKvtEcUJNv8gCaAuNs
> /BGSoE82nb1px3HzkODZK70=
> =96bB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> --
> 
> fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
> 
> 


--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux