On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 08:47:04AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: Content-Description: signed data
On Friday 02 April 2004 00:59, John Pybus wrote:You seem to be suggesting that Fedora legacy will support 7.x while there is a community to do so, but will drop support for FC1 community interest or not. Surely that's not right?
I appreciate a minimum supported time for FCx being defined, but after that FC1 should be in the same boat as RH9. If there is a large enough user community why shouldn't support continue?
Our resources are already spread thin. I'm pretty disappointed with the lack of community effort. There are a few hard working people, but nothing near what I had hoped for. Taking on more than what we can really feasibly do will be bad for the project. I'd much rather fully support a few releases, than halfassed support many many releases.
Well, I appreciate the effort going into FL, I have 2 servers with
RH7.X/FL and one with RH9 soon to go FL. So I directly benefit from FL.
But how can I help? I am not much of a programmer, and I can't risk the
servers by "testing" packages. What can I do to help?
-- Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock Think for yourselves and allow others the privilege to do the same. - Voltare
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
