-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 21 January 2004 04:00, Warren Togami wrote: > https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=163 > The libsafe package needs fixing if Legacy wants to use it. It must > remain the old fedora.us-style package naming in order to not conflict > with fedora.us' libsafe. > > Thoughts? I personally don't like the idea of more addons for legacy systems. The goal has been to change as little as possible. Starting an addon trend may wind up getting us inundated with requests to add this, or update that. I do think that it would fit in with Fedora.us, although you've stated that you didn't want to do extras for the older releases. I suppose I'll leave it up to the community to see if anybody would be interested in seeing this show up on the page, but frankly, we've got enough to do w/out adding optional packages to the mix. There are plenty of packages to QA and a few updates-testing to test and get ready for full release. - -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (http://geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy) Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFADqSU4v2HLvE71NURAlRlAKCFZLHIuPR/jD7h3oj3bjLbsbdy8gCfV5Ae rA0CGZ/tdyC4cLpb6tz6DFE= =xqGs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
