I never used it but seems like a good idea. Especially if we are slowed in releases of a fixed. It might add some extra protection while we wait for a release. If libsafe in FC? -- Christian Pearce http://www.commnav.com Warren Togami said: > > seth vidal wrote: > >>> > >>>Modifying the world as an 'option' for legacy updates seems like a bad > >>>idea, a confusing idea for users, and generally a waste of time. If I've > >>>got older machines I want them to be left alone and just have security > >>>patches applied. I don't want to be putting brand new things on there. > >>> > >>>-sv > >>> > >> > >>This is why I suggested putting it on the webpage with lots of > >>documentation and manual installation only. The documentation would to > >>people NOT to use it unless they really know what they are doing and > >>willing to monitor their server for a while. > >> > > > > > > Why waste all the time building the packages and writing up the > > documentation? > > > > People should be working on new things for FC2 and not screwing around > > with old distributions. > > > > -sv > > Shrug. Most of the work is already done, and it has worked great for me > on these old distributions for years. I'm willing to do it. I am just > wondering if folks here think it is a proper thing to offer on the > Legacy web page or not. > > Warren > > > -- > > fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list >
