-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 19 January 2004 03:40, Chuck Wolber wrote: > I'd be interested to see us include lingual and architecture support in > those paths. Recall that the redhat storage paths are: > > $releasever/en/os/$arch Languages no longer make sense as they are merged into a single distribution. No need to add the language. Also, it makes little sense to split out the smaller arch stuff. It's not necessary when update tools give you the right package given the choices. It just creates more subdirs and more headaches. The $basearch I speak of is like i386 vs x86_64 vs ppc vs ia64 etc... not i386 vs i686. the small arch stuff can live in the same directory, just the way that Fedora Core does it. > I think they make a great deal of sense, and will prevent us from having > to play "two-path-monte" or create ugly symbolic link farms if we need > to make changes later. How would you have two-path-monte going on? - -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (http://geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy) Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFADASn4v2HLvE71NURAiUKAKCJ3jVayX3h1z3iV3d0WMa5NO9kPgCfdldk 5o4kpqXkvjckmVW+EBTiCSs= =vQwl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
