On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:01:09AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On 05 Jan 2004 17:57:00 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > > > I looked at the patch in comment #36 - it looks close - but off by a bit > > > Those section are (for the most part) present in 5040 - but not in the > > > kernel. I'll see if I can combine a patch out of those to make a 5040 > > > that applies clean. Though you're right 90% of 5040 is completely old. > > > > > > > the last 3 patch sections from 5040 work. > > What was the last kernel release from Red Hat that had patch 5040 > applied? > > The beginning of the patch adds some IRC/DCC stuff which is not in the > kernel. > > But the ip_conntrack fix should really be made patch #911. FWIW, I've done it that way for any future RHL9 update we do. Dave
