On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 17:52, seth vidal wrote: > On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 17:25, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On 05 Jan 2004 17:19:16 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103177 > > > > > If I can sort out the patch needed for 7.x can you test if it is fixed? > > > > > I don't have anything that I can use to test this, so... > > > But I have to build some kernels tonight anyway and I'll take a look to > > > see if I can straighten out patch 5040. > > > > I've added a comment to above bugzilla ticket. I assume the rest of patch > > 5040 is obsolete/out-of-date (it's from 2001) and only the ip_conntrack > > fix at the very bottom needs to be applied separately. > > > > The "oversight" mentioned by Dave Jones is likely that he thought patch > > 5040 is valid (it doesn't apply) and is applied in the spec file. Hence he > > appended the conntrack fix at the end. > > > > I'm going to test the fix, too. > > I looked at the patch in comment #36 - it looks close - but off by a bit > Those section are (for the most part) present in 5040 - but not in the > kernel. I'll see if I can combine a patch out of those to make a 5040 > that applies clean. Though you're right 90% of 5040 is completely old. > the last 3 patch sections from 5040 work. -sv
