Warren Togami (warren@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > >The new (4.2.1) behavior is more predictable, but it breaks backward > >compatibility with old packages that have broken requirements > >specifications (i.e., missing specific epochs when they're needed). If > >we want to move Red Hat 8.0 and 9 over to the new behavior, we could > >make new mozilla, etc. packages that work properly with RPM 4.2.1, > >however. > > Updates for Mozilla will most likely be needed one day, because of the > very large complexity of a behemoth like Mozilla we will surely have a > security update in the future. I think. Yes, but pushing a new RPM with this will cause problems for people installing original packages in the meantime. Bill
