> Why not assign packages to groups as determined on the redhat > installation eg: development applications/libs, networking > applications/libs, games, etc Then you could have 'teams' assigned to > each group of applications thus eliminating a single point of failure if > a single maintainer wanders up the mountain. Yeah, I'm a big fan of that. I've considered also dividing things up into remotely exploitable and locally exploitable packages. -Chuck -- Quantum Linux Laboratories - ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology * Education | -=^ Ad Astra Per Aspera ^=- * Integration | http://www.quantumlinux.com * Support | chuckw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?
