Re: [Fedora-legacy-list] Re: Initial Scope Determination

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This one time, at band camp, Chuck Wolber <chuckw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> > The tricky situation would be the announcement of an urgent security fix
> > (i.e., an exploit is already in the wild) and the previous changelog
> > entrant is hiking Mt. McKinley or has taken a lucrative job in Redmond,
> > WA. :-) Then the wiki could provide a relatively clear channel of
> > communication for volunteers looking to get a patched rpm into the
> > repository.
> 
> Which is why packages should be worked on by multiple people.

Why not assign packages to groups as determined on the redhat installation
eg: development applications/libs, networking applications/libs, games, etc
Then you could have 'teams' assigned to each group of applications thus
eliminating a single point of failure if a single maintainer wanders up
the mountain.

just my $0.02
Kind regards
Kevin

-- 
 ______                              
(_____ \                             
 _____) )  ____   ____   ____   ____ 
|  ____/  / _  ) / _  | / ___) / _  )
| |      ( (/ / ( ( | |( (___ ( (/ / 
|_|       \____) \_||_| \____) \____)
Kevin Waterson
Port Macquarie, Australia


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux