Re: RH9 vs Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RH9 vs Fedora
From: Eric Rostetter <rostetter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 22:23:14 -0600
In-reply-to: <039a01c3ab13$f875bda0$0100000a@lan>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311111605370.3878-100000@newross.rossberry.private> <039a01c3ab13$f875bda0$0100000a@lan>
Reply-to: fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: fedora-legacy-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs

Quoting Paul <zen23003@xxxxxxxxx>:

> I appreciate that this depends on volunteer numbers, but is it fair to
> assume that Fedora Core 1 would be supported beyond Red Hat 9, simply
> because it is more recent?

No, it is not fair to assume that.

Eric

References:
- Re: Cart before the horse
  - From: Jim Wildman
- RH9 vs Fedora
  - From: Paul

Prev by Date: Re: RH9 vs Fedora
Next by Date: Re: RH9 vs Fedora
Previous by thread: Re: RH9 vs Fedora
Next by thread: yum vs apt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Fedora Config] [PAM] [Fedora General Discussion] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Yosemite Questions]

Powered by Linux