-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 05 November 2003 07:41, Jeremy Portzer wrote: > But Red Hat did announce and conceive of Fedora Legacy. > But I guess you're saying they didn't conceive of the extended support > for 7.3 and 9, as they figure that 7.3 and 9 server users should migrate > to RHEL? Actually Red Hat didn't conceive of Legacy. I've been told that Warren Togami (of Fedora.us fame) had the idea somewhat formed and floated it to Red Hat during migration talks, and it wound up on the web page. I saw it and was interested in it, and found out that there really wasn't anything defined for it, and Warren gave me free reign to pick up the ball and run with it. Now we have Legacy with a more clearly defined goal set. Red Hat has been just a bit busy lately, and they haven't put any man hours into updating the fedora.redhat.com website with a more clear definition of what Legacy is. I'll be asking for that shortly. I had hoped to have a full blown website up prior to this, so that they could link to it, instead of or Wiki. And no, when Warren first brought up the idea, the support for 7.3 and 9 were not discussed. Red Hat did not know that this was a goal at first, but they do now. They are helping us as much as they can so that we can launch our server by the end of this month, and launch services in December when 7.3 goes EOL. Warren, please correct me if I'm wrong at all. - -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (http://geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy) Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/qSp04v2HLvE71NURAr3dAKC6KDKgsOIHZQ3OqM58h2cY4FlXaACdEF8V 3tLVg7z+DnRWWwhtsoN7M+8= =+ulQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
