On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 10:37, seth vidal wrote: > > Yes. But since the Fedora and Fedora Legacy software does not yet exist, > > it only inspires hope, and doesn't provide a solution yet. And sending > > it to fedora list is not the best idea. If I'm on the fedora list, I > > probably know about it already. Send it to the Red Hat lists, not the > > fedora lists. Send it to the RH related lists, to reach those not on > > the Red Hat lists. And put info on the Red Hat web site pointing to > > the Fedora and Fedora Legacy web sites. > > > > We're RH customers. We go to www.redhat.com for info. The info/links > > need to be there. Many of us are on Red Hat's public mailing list. They > > should be providing this information, or at least pointers to it. > > Red hat doesn't have any interest to do that afaict. They want to sell > RHEL - why drive people to something else? But Red Hat did announce and conceive of Fedora Legacy. But I guess you're saying they didn't conceive of the extended support for 7.3 and 9, as they figure that 7.3 and 9 server users should migrate to RHEL? --Jeremy -- /---------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Jeremy Portzer jeremyp@xxxxxxxxx trilug.org/~jeremy | | GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 | \---------------------------------------------------------------------/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
