Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/5] redhat: introduce versioning for Gemini kernels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2386#note_1341177765

Also by using RHEL_MAJOR you have packages kernel-redhat-0.1.x.el9 and kenrel-
redhat-1.1.x.el10 which are basically identical other than configs.  What are
the customer expectations here?  Will they think a 1.1.x kernel has more
features than a 0.1.x kernel even though the source-git is the same?  I know
it helps with rhel-10.5/6 rebase.  Just curious if the version scheme was
approved internally.
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux