Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/5] redhat: introduce versioning for Gemini kernels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2386#note_1341172348

@jstancek - so for rhel-9.6 we can expect a kernel package name to be 'kernel-
redhat-0.1.x.el9'?  Does anyone intuitively trust a version of 0.X?  Should we
start at 1?  Just a nitpick.  Or is that a later adjustment?

Second, I would propose ELN set GEMINI to 1.  That is kinda the spirit of ELN
and RHEL-10 I think.  Rawhide would stay with traditional uname.  Unless you
want to avoid that until the infra is ready?

Then if the second point makes sense, the idea of of separate GEMINI variable
is unnecessary and the spec variable 'rhel' can be used I believe.  A little
aggressive, but.. simplifies that patch set a bit.
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux