On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 9:06 AM Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 7:19 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I was wondering with which kernel version we are planning to ship Fedora 34 gold ? > > > > I expect 5.12 final to be released on April 19th, which puts it just past the > > F34 final freeze. So I was wondering if we are going to stick with 5.11, or > > since things are close, do the 5.12-rc7 to final bump during the freeze? > > Your timeline is off: > > the v5.12 kernel predictions: merge window closes on Sunday, > 2021-03-07 and release on Sunday, 2021-05-02 PHB timeline actually would have an rc8 for 5.11, which I don't expect, but even without that, it is expecting no rc8 for 5.12, so if we had no rc8 for either, the earliest we would see 5.12 is 2021-04-25. If something pops up this week and we end up with an rc8 for both 5.11 and 5.12 it could be as late as 2021-05-09. In either case, the preferred target date for F34 is 2021-04-20, and the slip date is 2021-04-27. There is no way we can get 5.12 final there. > > Fedora 34 will ship with 5.11. Of course we will rebase to 5.12 when > it is appropriate to do so. > > > > > The reason I'm asking is that the 5.12 kernel has the kernel interfaces which > > power-profile-daemon: > > > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/Teams/Design/settings-mockups/-/blob/master/power/power.png > > http://www.hadess.net/2020/09/power-profiles-daemon-new-project.html > > > > Will use to set the performance (aka platform) profile on for example > > ThinkPad laptops. > > > > So if we are going to ship with 5.12, then everything will be great, > > but if we are going to go with 5.11, then I should probably backport > > the necessary bits to the Fedora 5.11 kernels (the patches are not that > > big, it just took a while for everyone to agree on the userspace API). > > > > So, what kernel-version are we planning on shipping F34 gold with? > > > > While F34 will ship with 5.11, it should be well past the merge window > for 5.12, and I expect those patches will be in linus' tree at that > point. If that is the case, I don't see why they can't be brought back > to 5.11 if they are non invasive. > > Justin _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
