On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 17:55 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 10:05 -0600, Justin Forbes wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 7:57 AM Veronika Kabatova < > > vkabatov@xxxxxxxxxx > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Sérgio Basto" <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > To: "Veronika Kabatova" <vkabatov@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Kernel Fedora" > > > > < > > > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 3:59:42 PM > > > > Subject: Re: scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version > > > > `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by > > > > scripts/basic/fixdep) > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 07:46 -0500, Veronika Kabatova wrote: > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > From: "Sérgio Basto" <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > To: "Kernel Fedora" <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 12:22:12 AM > > > > > > Subject: scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version > > > > > > `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep) > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > with kernels from fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug > > > > > > [1]compilation of > > > > > > kmods > > > > > > started fail because [2] , how we can fix this issue ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > dnf --enablerepo=fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug update > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version > > > > > > `GLIBC_2.33' > > > > > > not > > > > > > found > > > > > > (required by scripts/basic/fixdep) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > we're seeing a similar issue with upstream kernels built on > > > > > rawhide > > > > > for the past ~week. > > > > > > > > > > Specifically in our case we're compiling bpf-next tree > > > > > (though > > > > > based > > > > > on the message I'm replying to it doesn't matter). The kernel > > > > > is then > > > > > installed on Fedora 33 with an attempt to rebuild some > > > > > modules > > > > > which > > > > > fails with > > > > > > > > > > /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-rc3/tools/objtool//fixdep: > > > > > /lib64/libc.so.6: > > > > > version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by > > > > > /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-rc3/tools/objtool//fixdep) > > > > > > > > > > This is on x86_64. > > > > > > > > > > Did anyone manage to find out what what's causing this? Is it > > > > > a > > > > > mismatch of versions between rawhide and fc33 that's not > > > > > expected to > > > > > work? @Sérgio are you also using the kernels with fc33 or > > > > > purely > > > > > rawhide? > > A mismatch of modules is definitely expected not to work. Fedora > > runs > > without CONFIG_MODVERSIONS because we do not in any way promise > > KABI. > > Because of this, if you want to run a module, it must be built with > > the same compiler/environment that the kernel you wish to insert it > > into is built. If you need out of tree modules, rawhide/nodebug > > kernels will need to be run in rawhide, or rebuilt against the > > version > > of Fedora you wish to run it on. > > I think [1] make it work Hi, As the copy didn't work, I tried this [2] that worked for me, ie akmods build kmod successfully for 5.10.0-0.rc7.20201211git33dc9614dc2 [2] cd /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-0.rc7.20201211git33dc9614dc20.97.fc34.x86_64 rm tools/objtool/fixdep scripts/basic/fixdep tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/fixdep cd tools/ make objtool cd .. make (I think just need to build fixdep again) > , the problem is these binaries (fixdep, > objtool and modpost) that are compiled in rawhide with a new glibc > ... > > [1] > cp /usr/src/kernels/5.9.9-100.fc32.x86_64/scripts/basic/fixdep > /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-0.rc6.90.fc34.x86_64/scripts/basic/ > cp /usr/src/kernels/5.9.9-100.fc32.x86_64/tools/objtool/objtool > /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-0.rc6.90.fc34.x86_64/tools/objtool/ > cp /usr/src/kernels/5.9.9-100.fc32.x86_64/scripts/mod/modpost > /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-0.rc6.90.fc34.x86_64/scripts/mod/ > > > > > Sometimes when I want test builds of kernel modules (with > > > > akmods > > > > of > > > > RPMFusion), I install kernels from fedora-rawhide-kernel- > > > > nodebug > > > > or kernel-stabilization . > > > > I workaround it, by building the kernels that I want to test on > > > > copr > > > > [1] for that I download src.rpm from koji . > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the update! Unfortunately building in copr doesn't > > > work > > > for us. > > > > > > ccing Don and Justin, have you ever run into this issue with > > > building on rawhide? > > > > > > > I have not seen any issues, though I don't build any out of tree > > modules either. > > > > Justin > > _______________________________________________ > > kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe send an email to > > kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > -- > Sérgio M. B. > _______________________________________________ > kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
