Re: scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 10:05 -0600, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 7:57 AM Veronika Kabatova <vkabatov@xxxxxxxxxx
> > wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Sérgio Basto" <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: "Veronika Kabatova" <vkabatov@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Kernel Fedora" <
> > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 3:59:42 PM
> > > Subject: Re: scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version
> > > `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by
> > > scripts/basic/fixdep)
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 07:46 -0500, Veronika Kabatova wrote:
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Sérgio Basto" <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > To: "Kernel Fedora" <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 12:22:12 AM
> > > > > Subject: scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version
> > > > > `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > 
> > > > > with kernels from fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug
> > > > > [1]compilation of
> > > > > kmods
> > > > >  started fail because [2]  , how we can fix this issue ?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > [1]
> > > > > dnf --enablerepo=fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug update
> > > > > 
> > > > > [2]
> > > > > scripts/basic/fixdep: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33'
> > > > > not
> > > > > found
> > > > > (required by scripts/basic/fixdep)
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > we're seeing a similar issue with upstream kernels built on
> > > > rawhide
> > > > for the past ~week.
> > > > 
> > > > Specifically in our case we're compiling bpf-next tree (though
> > > > based
> > > > on the message I'm replying to it doesn't matter). The kernel
> > > > is then
> > > > installed on Fedora 33 with an attempt to rebuild some modules
> > > > which
> > > > fails with
> > > > 
> > > > /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-rc3/tools/objtool//fixdep:
> > > > /lib64/libc.so.6:
> > > > version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by
> > > > /usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-rc3/tools/objtool//fixdep)
> > > > 
> > > > This is on x86_64.
> > > > 
> > > > Did anyone manage to find out what what's causing this? Is it a
> > > > mismatch of versions between rawhide and fc33 that's not
> > > > expected to
> > > > work? @Sérgio are you also using the kernels with fc33 or
> > > > purely
> > > > rawhide?
> A mismatch of modules is definitely expected not to work. Fedora runs
> without CONFIG_MODVERSIONS because we do not in any way promise KABI.
> Because of this, if you want to run a module, it must be built with
> the same compiler/environment that the kernel you wish to insert it
> into is built.  If you need out of tree modules, rawhide/nodebug
> kernels will need to be run in rawhide, or rebuilt against the
> version
> of Fedora you wish to run it on.

I think [1] make it work , the problem is these binaries (fixdep,
objtool and modpost)  that are compiled in rawhide with a new glibc
... 

[1] 
cp /usr/src/kernels/5.9.9-100.fc32.x86_64/scripts/basic/fixdep
/usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-0.rc6.90.fc34.x86_64/scripts/basic/
cp /usr/src/kernels/5.9.9-100.fc32.x86_64/tools/objtool/objtool
/usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-0.rc6.90.fc34.x86_64/tools/objtool/
cp /usr/src/kernels/5.9.9-100.fc32.x86_64/scripts/mod/modpost
/usr/src/kernels/5.10.0-0.rc6.90.fc34.x86_64/scripts/mod/

> > > Sometimes when I want test builds of kernel modules (with akmods
> > > of
> > > RPMFusion), I install kernels from fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug
> > > or kernel-stabilization .
> > > I workaround it, by building the kernels that I want to test on
> > > copr
> > > [1] for that I download src.rpm from koji .
> > > 
> > 
> > Thanks for the update! Unfortunately building in copr doesn't work
> > for us.
> > 
> > ccing Don and Justin, have you ever run into this issue with
> > building on rawhide?
> > 
> 
> I have not seen any issues, though I don't build any out of tree
> modules either.
> 
> Justin
> _______________________________________________
> kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux