Re: kernel-ark | Pipeline #145379201 has failed for osnamechange | 1b1d4554 in !354

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/13/20 10:31 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 07:22:45AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> On 5/13/20 3:50 AM, Jiri Benc wrote:
>>> On Tue, 12 May 2020 20:19:09 -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>>> My patch in merge request 354 changes the names of makefile targets from rh-* to
>>>> dist-*
>>>
>>> I haven't seen that patch on kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. What's
>>> going on?
> 
> The piece of the puzzle you are probably missing is:
> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark-ci
> 

Thanks.  That's what I was looking for.

> which holds the CI scripts.  It is in a separate repo for security reasons
> (don't want a kernel change to include modifying the CI scripts to falsely
> pass something malicious).
> 
> However, that split leads to the scenario you are in, how to update both at
> the same time, which we were trying to avoid again for security reasons
> (always want to use either a tag or head of master, not a custom branch for
> the CI scripts).
> 
> We may have to create a transition patch to handle this.  Unfortunately you
> hit this scenario sooner than we were expecting to deal with it. :-(

Heh :)  Of course it's my fault :) :)

How about these steps?

1) I patch to add the dist-* targets and keep the old rh-* targets temporarily.
This patch will be messy unless someone has some  Makefile-fu.
2) I modify the kernel-ark-ci scripts to use the dist-* targets.
3) I patch to remove the old rh-* targets which will result in an overall clean
patch.

Would that work for everyone?

P.

> 
> Cheers,
> Don
> 
>>>
>>
>> jbenc,
>>
>> My patch will be posted only after it passes CKI by the bridge.  I'm using the
>> suggested kernel-ark wiki procedure at
>>
>> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/wikis/Contributor-guide
>>
>> You can see my patch here
>>
>> https://gitlab.com/prarit/kernel-ark/-/commit/1b1d4554fc1b7f76a690fe9255ad75609e9ffe25
>>
>> The patch fails CKI because first test builds an srpm using 'make rh-srpm'.  My
>> patch changes all the rh-* makefile target names from rh-* to dist-*, which
>> breaks the CKI test because 'rh-srpm' is not longer a makefile target.
>>
>> IOW this is a chicken-and-egg problem and I'm not sure how get around it.
>>
>> P.
>> _______________________________________________
>> kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux