On 08/24/2017 10:18 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Flock is next week and there is a session about kernel process >>> (https://flock2017.sched.com/event/Bm9W/fedora-kernel-process-review). >>> Obviously not everyone can attend flock but if there are topics >>> you would like to see discussed, please let me know. >> >> Presumably you have i686 kernel maintenance from a x86-32 SIG on that? > > Why would that be necessary? It's a talk about process. The process > should be the same regardless of who is doing the work. I doubt we > need to have specific topics per architecture. If we do, why wouldn't > we do one for aarch64, s390x and ppc64le and ppc64? > > This is my opinion alone, but if an x86-32 SIG wants to form and > participate, they need to form and participate like everyone else. > > josh > I did not have i686 on the agenda mostly because the state of it is still unclear. I do consider not-x86 arches worth of process discussion though mostly because it isn't handled by Justin and I. If there are specific aspects of the kernel process that could be improved for those people who work on subsets of the kernel (e.g. arches), I think that's a good topic for this forum. So, if arm/aarch64/s390x/ppc64/ppc64le/i686 people have specific process topics, I can add that to the agenda. I don't want to have an open discussion on i686 though as I think that belongs elsewhere. Thanks, Laura _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
