On 24.07.2017 15:53, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 2017-07-24 15:28 GMT+02:00 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > And I still don't know what problem you're trying to solve. Still NAK. I guess the bugzilla number in the subject is meant as an explanation: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450577 FWIW, I welcome that finally someone is working towards getting this fixed, as it seems users have a hard time understanding and handling kernel-devel packages. I didn't look to much into this recently, but I think there might be an easier and better solution: Don't provide variant specific kernel-devel package at all (like kernel-PAE-devel), just ship one kernel-devel package that provides the files for all the kernel variants on the architecture in question (IOW: on x86-32 simply ship the files that currently are in kernel-PAE-devel in kernel-devel instead & get rid of kernel-PAE-devel). Sure, kernel-devel gets bigger. But my gut says it's the better solution (but I didn't check and someone should how much it grows if we want to go down that route). CU, knurd _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
