On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:57 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 23.08.2016 13:32, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > That was already done once. > > Yeah, but back then Ubuntu wasn't on board iirc, as they afaics added > some of those patches only a few months ago. When 15.10 was released you > could still load unsigned modules even when secure boot was enabled; > that changed with a kernel update (I was told) and was different in > 16.04 from the start. > > IOW: one more and important player in the field with similar goals. I > guess that was one of the points I wanted to make but didn't state > clearly enough. > > Unfortunately, I don't recall Ubuntu developers being part of the upstream opposition that blocked this after agreement. > > […] > > I don't want people to get them impression that it will be simple or > > trivial to upstream. > > +1 > > In theory, it should be, but we have seen that this isn't the case. Justin _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
