On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:08 PM, John Dulaney <jdulaney@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:28:18PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: >> The secure boot patches have been around in the Fedora tree for a while now. >> They work well enough but there has not been much active work in getting >> them accepted upstream in recent years. The longer they exist out of tree >> the harder they get to maintain without extra support. If there isn't a >> path for the current secure boot patch set to be accepted upstream, we need >> to seriously consider if it's worth carrying long term. >> >> Thoughts? > > So, how would we handle secure boot moving forward? How are other distros handling this? Does upstream have an alternative? -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
