>> Does it make sense to consider just going straight to 4.4 then given >> it'll be out early Jan? > > > Arguably it's never a good thing to skip entire kernel release since you > loose potential feedback from that release. > > It's better to adapt a ( faster ) re-base model. > > So far there has not been any problems that I'm aware of with the rebase > model in place with the exception of it's ( intentional ) initial delay > from upstream release or when the kernel has been split into ( more ) sub > components but Josh and the rest of the kernel community might be aware of > other shortcomings moving the entire Fedora GA release to the same kernel at > the same time when the first 0.1 release has been made and immediately after > it has been made ( unless ofcourse there are holidays in the horizon which > is the case here and people unavailable during that time ). We're talking a one of situation and I'm very aware of all the Fedora kernel history for years. The scenario I mention above is only suggested because 1) the timing of both is very close 2) 4.4 is due to be a LTS kernel and it's likely as a result a lot are ignoring 4.3 altogether 3) a large chunk of QA work to then suddenly have to rebase again in a short period of time. It was a query to Josh, nothing more. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
