Re: [kernel/f21] Make sure acpi brightness_switch is disabled (like forever in Fedora)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 29-07-15 17:06, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Josh,
>>>>
>>>> On 07/28/2014 07:04 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> commit e6fe382d1d53d4cdf9b544729dc823d4eab0217c
>>>>> Author: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Date:   Mon Jul 28 13:03:01 2014 -0400
>>>>>
>>>>>      Make sure acpi brightness_switch is disabled (like forever in
>>>>> Fedora)
>>>>>
>>>>>      Upstream reverted the change to turn the ACPI
>>>>> brightness_switch_enabled
>>>>>      parameter off by default.  Revert the revert so we go back to the
>>>>> state
>>>>>      Fedora has traditionally been in.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ack, I was planning on doing this myself but you beat me to it, thanks
>>>> for
>>>> taking care of this.
>>>>
>>>> Note that 3.17 will have this patch:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=linux-next&id=8ab58e8e7e097bae5fe39cbc67eb93a91f7134b7
>>>>
>>>> Which fixes the 2 steps being taken for one keypress problem while
>>>> keeping the acpi brightness_switch behavior enabled, so that people who
>>>> have an acpi-video controlled backlight and a userspace which does not
>>>> do backlight control (e.g. windowmaker).
>>>>
>>>> So for 3.17 we should IMHO drop the revert-revert and stick with
>>>> upstream behavior.
>>>
>>>
>>> OK.
>>
>>
>> Oops.  The revert-revert patch was never actually dropped so long ago.
>> So we're still defaulting the ACPI brightness_switch_enabled parameter
>> off by default in Fedora.
>>
>> If you still believe we should drop it
>
>
> Yes I still believe we should drop it, the kernel has had a workaround
> for the double brightness changes this used to cause for quite some
> while now, and the closer to upstream we are the better IMHO.

I thought as much.  I will do it today so it doesn't get forgotten
again.  Thank you.

josh
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux