> Call that latter one "upstream status. We could perhaps make that a > requirement of the git commit log, or part of the patch itself in a > specific format. I've been trying to do this kind of ad hoc by > keeping PatchList.txt up to date in f20 and rawhide, but I have to > admit it kind of sucks. Having it be part of the patch file itself > might make things easier. I wondered where the information for that email came from, I've never notice the PatchList.txt file before. If it's not easy to add the information to the patches maybe the information could be added as comments with the patch lines, I know this adds more size to an already large .spec file but at least all the information is in the one place. Peter _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
