On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 07:06:48PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > So that the userland package we build there is useful? > > OK. Did it get tested? > No, it's not a code change on any supported architecture beyond ARM. > > If you want to drop it, drop it then. > > > >> Also, please post for review first. > >> > > > > As soon as you guys start? Given I was explicitly given commit access, > > and I'm not just running rampant with global commit permission or > > something, I am just fixing what I see needing to be fixed. > > We have started. Any patch that doesn't have a bug attached to it and > isn't a rebase or config change has been posted here first for the > past few cases. If I've missed some, I'm as guilty as the next guy. > It's not about running rampant with commit permission. It's about > knowing where stuff is coming from and why. > Fine, whatever, given this is a requirement no other package seems to have, I'm disinclined to contribute further. Congrats. Also, I think documenting fixes to your patches beyond the %changelog is a waste of my time given the general quality of the out of tree crap you've stuffed in there already. --Kyle _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
