On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 04:38:53PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 11:43 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:13:59AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 04:56:38PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > > > > Bruce sent me 2 patches yesterday, but haven't got to test them yet. > > > > > > > The code is not activated by default, so there is little harm in putting > > > > > > > them in, the only thing that will fail is gssproxy, as the whole code > > > > > > > path is enabled only if gssproxy is started at boot. > > > > > > > > > > > > Did you get a chance to test them? I'm doing an update today. > > > > > > > > > > Just setting it up, so I'd expect results in a couple hours. > > > > > > > > Hah, bad estimate. Anyway, > > > > > > > > git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux-topics.git 3.9-gssproxy-backport > > > > > > > > now includes three additional bugfixes that I need to get it working for me. > > > > > > I've added those to the F19 kernel repo. There isn't a kernel built yet > > > that contains them, but they'll be included in the next build. > > > > Thanks! Simo, could you test that when it's available and let me know > > either way? > > > > As I say it's working for me, but our setups are a little different (the > > bug fixed by the second patch manifested in a different way for me, for > > example, though I suspect it was the same bug). > > I'm on PTO through the rest of the week but I can do a quick test as > soon as someone tells me a kernel is available. The fixes are in 3.9.6-301.fc19 now. josh _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
