Re: Backport of gssproxy patches for Fedora 19

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 04:56:38PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > > Bruce sent me 2 patches yesterday, but haven't got to test them yet.
> > > > The code is not activated by default, so there is little harm in putting
> > > > them in, the only thing that will fail is gssproxy, as the whole code
> > > > path is enabled only if gssproxy is started at boot.
> > > 
> > > Did you get a chance to test them?  I'm doing an update today.
> > 
> > Just setting it up, so I'd expect results in a couple hours.
> 
> Hah, bad estimate.  Anyway, 
> 
> 	git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux-topics.git 3.9-gssproxy-backport
> 
> now includes three additional bugfixes that I need to get it working for me.

I've added those to the F19 kernel repo.  There isn't a kernel built yet
that contains them, but they'll be included in the next build.

josh
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux