On Jul 26, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 02:21:52PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: >> 3.x needs a bunch of userspace updated, which could explain things like the raid >> failure you're seeing. That's why we're doing a 2.6.40 for updates. >> It's 3.0 in all but name. >> > > Very little should be broken by the x.y.z/3.0.0, most of the broken > userspace was due to x.y version numbers, and strict test on the result > of scanf. Been running 3.0 rc kernels for some time on an f15 box without any problems, though its mainly for testing local kernel changes, so I wouldn't have seen much in the way of userspace breakage. But the box does have software (md) raid, and it comes up fine. I just assume push 3.0 as 3.0, starting with testing. The userspace all has to work eventually anyway, so why not fix it in f15. -- Jarod Wilson jarod@xxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
