On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 02:21:52PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > 3.x needs a bunch of userspace updated, which could explain things like the raid > failure you're seeing. That's why we're doing a 2.6.40 for updates. > It's 3.0 in all but name. > Very little should be broken by the x.y.z/3.0.0, most of the broken userspace was due to x.y version numbers, and strict test on the result of scanf. --Kyle _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
