Re: f15 2.6.39 rebase

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/30/2011 03:04 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> W dniu 30 czerwca 2011 20:58 użytkownik Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> napisał:

>> A lot of broken software is assuming version numbers are 2.6.x. We could push a load
>> of userspace packages to fix it, but that's just the stuff we control. 3rd party add-ons
>> would break for no good reason.
>>
>> This deviates from what upstream calls it, but it's just a number, and not breaking
>> existing code in an update is more important here.
> 
> Of course you are absolutely right at this point :)
> 
> Thanks for your answer.
> 
>>  For f16 of course, we'll make
>> the 3.0 transition, because moving to a new release has differing expectations,
>> and by the time it ships, hopefully everything that cares will be fixed.
>>
>>        Dave
>>

   For what its worth - so far - running 3.0 on F15 I did need procps &
mdadm updated - otherwise I've not seen too many issues that I know about.

   What else do you think might be breaking / broken / grumpy ?
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux